《倭名类聚抄》征引《尔雅》旧注探析  

Analysis of Quoting Old Annotations from Erya(《尔雅》)in the Collection of Wamyōruiju shō(《倭名类聚抄》)

作　　者：任开迪 窦秀艳[1] Ren Kaidi;Dou Xiuyan(School of Literature,Journalism and Communication,Qingdao University,Qingdao 266071,China)

机构地区：[1]青岛大学文学与新闻传播学院,山东青岛266071

出　　处：《现代语文》2024年第2期31-38,共8页Modern Chinese

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“《尔雅》异文通考”(19BYYZ145)。

摘　　要：《倭名类聚抄》是日本较早的类书,它援引《尔雅》及旧注共222例,征引量位于中日古籍的第三位。其中,明确标明征引李巡《尔雅注》2例、孙炎《尔雅注》6例、沈旋《尔雅集注》37例。通过与清人辑佚成果、《尔雅》传世版本的对勘与比较,不难看出,这些引文既能够丰富雅学研究材料、补充清人辑佚缺失,还可以归纳出域外学者征引《尔雅》的方式与特点。希望通过这一个案的探讨,不仅为《尔雅》研究开辟新的视角和路径,也为《尔雅》传本异文“当代化”问题提供借鉴与思考。Wamyōruiju shō(《倭名类聚抄》)is an earlier encyclopedia in Japan,which cites 222 examples of Erya(《尔雅》)and other old annotations,ranking third in terms of citation volume among ancient Chinese and Japanese books.It is clearly indicated that 2 cases were cited from Li Xun’s Erya Zhu(《尔雅注》),6 cases were cited from Sun Yan’s Erya Zhu(《尔雅注》),and 37 cases were cited from Shen Xuan’s Erya Jizhu(《尔雅集注》).By comparing and analyzing the achievements of the Qing dynasty’s compilation of lost text works and the surviving versions of Erya(《尔雅》),it is not difficult to find that these citations can not only enrich the research materials of the study of Erya(《尔雅》)and supplement the deficiency of the Qing dynasty’s compilation of lost text works,but also summarize the ways and characteristics of foreign scholars citing Erya(《尔雅》).We hope that this study not only open up the new perspectives and paths for the study of Erya(《尔雅》),but also provide the reference and reflection on the issue of“modernization”of the variant texts in Erya(《尔雅》).

关 键 词：《倭名类聚抄》 《尔雅》 《尔雅注》 《尔雅集注》 

分 类 号：H131.2[语言文字—汉语]