《聊斋志异》与《镜花缘》科举叙事的比较研究  

A Comparative Study on the Narrative of the Imperial Examination between Liaozhai Zhiyi and Flowers in the Mirror

作　　者：尚继武[1] Shang Jiwu(Editorial Department of Journal of Lianyungang Normal College,Lianyungang 222006,China)

机构地区：[1]连云港师范高等专科学校学报编辑部,江苏连云港222006

出　　处：《蒲松龄研究》2024年第1期80-95,共16页Study on Pu Songling

摘　　要：《聊斋志异》《镜花缘》虽然一为文言小说一为章回小说,所叙科举考试故事中应试者的角色身份及应试结果差异较大,但是两部作品在故事情节、人物形象和科举心态等方面多有相似之处。这两部作品科举叙事存在的相似处,或许是古代小说科举叙事传统的影响所致,或许是李汝珍可能读过或者听人介绍过《聊斋志异》故事所致,或许是李汝珍与蒲松龄有相似的科场经历与见闻所致;其相异之处,则与各自的作者在家世家境、志趣遭际、社会环境等方面存在的差异有关。Although the stories of Liaozhai Zhiyi and Flowers in the Mirror are both classical Chinese novels and chapter novels,there are significant differences in the role identities and exam results of the participants in the imperial examination exam.However,there are many similarities in the plot,character images,and imperial examination mentality between the two novels.The similarities between Liaozhai Zhiyi and Flowers in the Mirror may be due to the influence of the narrative tradition of the imperial examination in ancient novels,or maybe LI fuzhen may have read or heard about the story of Liaozhai Zhiyi,or maybe LI fuzhen and PU Songling have similar examination experience and knowledge.The differences between these two works are related to their differences in family background,interests,social environment,and other aspects.

关 键 词：清代小说 比较研究 《聊斋志异》 《镜花缘》 

分 类 号：I207.419[文学—中国文学]