基于产业链、创新链、资金链、服务链融合模型的科技创新效能分析——以深圳、杭州、苏州为例  

fiEfficiency Analysis of Science and Technology Innovation Based on the Integration Model of the Industrial Chain,Innovation Chain,Capital Chain,and Service Chain:A Case Study of Shenzhen,Hangzhou,and Suzhou

作　　者：彭娟 曾琼[2] 马文卓[2] 冯梅[2] PENG Juan;ZENG Qiong;MA Wenzhuo;FENG Mei(College of Economics and Management,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China;Chongqing Productivity Council,Chongqing 400013,China)

机构地区：[1]西南大学经济管理学院,重庆400715 [2]重庆生产力促进中心,重庆400013

出　　处：《中国科技人才》2024年第1期62-71,共10页Scientific and Technology Talents of China

基　　金：西南大学创新研究2035先导计划(SWUPilotPlan028)。

摘　　要：基于产业链、创新链、资金链、服务链内涵及理论基础,构建融合模型,选择传统科研基础薄弱但科技创新效能突出的深圳、杭州、苏州进行案例分析。研究结果显示,三地基于产业链、创新链、资金链、服务链融合的科技创新模式各有侧重。深圳突出产业链的核心作用,杭州强调创新链的赋能效果,苏州重视产业链、创新链、资金链、服务链协同的生态软实力打造。同时,三地在领军企业的创新主体地位、科技创新服务意识和能力、区域科技创新体系整体效能发挥等方面体现出一些共性特征。Based on the connotation and theoretical basis of the industrial chain,innovation chain,capital chain,and service chain,a integration model is constructed.Shenzhen,Hangzhou and Suzhou,where the traditional scientific research foundation is weak but the efficiency of scientific and technological innovation is outstanding,are selected for case analysis.Results show that these three places have different focuses on the science and technology innovation mode based on the integration of the industrial chain,innovation chain,capital chain and service chain.Shenzhen highlights the core role of the industrial chain,Hangzhou emphasizes the empowering effect of the innovation chain,and Suzhou attaches importance to the building of four chains collaborative ecological soft power.At the same time,the three places have some common characteristics in the leading enterprises’main body position of innovation,science and technology innovation service awareness and ability,and the overall efficiency of the regional science and technology innovation system.

关 键 词：产业链、创新链、资金链、服务链 融合模型 案例分析 

分 类 号：F127[经济管理—世界经济]