Advocacy inquiry and circular questioning to maintain psychological safety in training,feedback,and conversations with residents  

作　　者：Fatimah Lateef 

机构地区：[1]Department of Emergency Medicine,Singapore General Hospital,Singapore,Emergency Medicine Residency,SingHealth,Singapore,Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine,National University of Singapore and Lee Kong Chian Medical School,Nanyang Technological University,SingHealth Duke NUS Institute of Medical Simulation(SIMS),Singapore,Duke NUS Global Health Institute,Singapore.

出　　处：《Emergency and Critical Care Medicine》2024年第1期35-38,共4页急危重症医学（英文）

摘　　要：Training of emergency physicians through an emergency medicine residency program takes 5 years,that is,3 years in junior residency and 2 years in senior residency.Throughout this period,residents will be exposed to a variety of educational methodologies and meet a spectrum of faculty,supervisors,and teachers,who will have different personalities,styles,and approaches to teaching and nurturing them.It is important to ensure the maintenance of psychological safety for these residents throughout their training journey and into the future years of practice s an emergency physician.Communications,interactions(which involve questioning),and presentations will be an important part of this training program.This article looks at two modes of questioning:advocacy inquiry and circular questioning,which can be applied as appropriate.These two methods are examples in which faculty may consider adopting in their many interactions,follow-up,feedback,tutorials,facilitation,partnerships,and counseling sessions with residents.These two techniques offer options to maintain psychological safety,which can facilitate learners sharing and opening up.It can be included in the faculty’s armamentarium of questioning techniques and applied where applicable.

关 键 词：Advocacy Circular questions Emergency medicine INQUIRY RESIDENTS 

分 类 号：R192.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]