刑民交叉视阈下“复制发行型”著作权犯罪的实证研究——以128份裁判文书为样本  

The Empirical Study of“Copyrighting and Distributing”Copyright Crime under the Threshold of Criminal and Civilian Cross Vision——Based on a Sample of 128 Judgments

作　　者：赵杨 简雯琪 ZHAO Yang;JIAN Wenqi(Department of Law,Guangdong Police College,Guangzhou Guangdong 510230;School of Law,South China Normal University,Guangzhou Guangdong 510006)

机构地区：[1]广东警官学院法律系,广东广州510230 [2]华南师范大学法学院,广东广州510006

出　　处：《牡丹江大学学报》2024年第4期47-53,共7页Journal of Mudanjiang University

基　　金：广东省教育厅普通高校青年创新人才项目“袭警罪司法适用实证研究”(项目编号:2023WQNCX048);广东省科技创新战略专项资金(“攀登计划”专项资金)项目“《刑法修正案(十一)》背景下妨害传染病防治罪的检视与完善”(项目编号:pdjh2022b0144)。

摘　　要：《刑法》第217条侵犯著作权罪中“复制发行”的解释长期与《著作权法》和《刑法》其他条文存在冲突与争议。选取128份“复制发行型”侵犯著作权犯罪的判决书,发现在司法实践中“发行”行为存在必然选择性、现有司法解释事实上导致了罪名的混同、侵犯著作权罪中罪刑失衡问题严重。在刑民交叉视阈下对侵犯著作权罪进行检视,应肯定《刑法修正案(十一)》修订与《著作权法》在信息网络传播行为上的协调,并应加强《刑法》中“复制发行”内涵与《著作权法》衔接,细化侵犯著作权罪的量刑标准,以规范侵犯著作权罪的适用,形成更完善的著作权刑法保护体系。The interpretation of“reproduction and distribution”in the crime of copyright infringement in Article 217 of the Criminal Law has long been in conflict with the Copyright Law and other provisions of the Criminal Law.Selecting 128 judgments of copyright infringement crimes of“copy and distribution”,it is found that there is inevitable selectivity of“distribution”in judicial practice,the existing judicial interpretation actually leads to the confusion of charges,and the imbalance of crimes and penalties in copyright infringement crimes is serious.Form a more perfect copyright criminal law protection system.

关 键 词：刑民交叉 复制发行 侵犯著作权罪 实证研究 

分 类 号：D924.33[政治法律—刑法学]