渐进循环:基层协作治理纠纷的逻辑——以J市S镇上锁纠纷为例  

Progressive Cycle:The Logic of Collaborative Governance in Grassroots Disputes——Taking the Lockout Dispute in S Town,J City as an Example

作　　者：宋惠芳[1] 陶江南 SONG Hui-fang;TAO Jiang-nan(School of Culture,Tourism and Public Administration,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou,Fujian 350117)

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学文化旅游与公共管理学院,福建福州350117

出　　处：《公共治理研究》2024年第2期63-72,共10页PUBLIC GOVERNANCE RESEARCH

摘　　要：行政调解是基层治理体系和治理能力的重要组成部分,就过程而言多为多元协作的渐进式调解。本研究基于Ansell和Gash的协作治理理论,建构本土化的渐进循环协作分析框架,以J市S镇上锁纠纷为例,探究渐进循环式行政调解的治理逻辑及所蕴含的中国式解纷之道。研究发现,政府引导与民主决策、部际协作与分级治理、法理相助与情理相济是实现解纷目标的重要基础。同时,解纷过程中需注意:规范调解过程,将争吵关进制度的笼子;明确解题方案,针对问题实施有效调解;重视信任构建,提高协作的信任水平;加强群众自治,构建多级调解序列。Administrative mediation is an important component of the grassroots governance system and governance capacity,and in terms of process,it is mostly a progressive mediation with multiple collaborations.Based on the collaborative governance theory of Ansell and Gash,a localized analytical framework of progressive and cyclical collaboration is constructed.Taking the lockout dispute in S town of J city as an example to explore the governance logic of progressive and cyclical administrative mediation and the Chinese way of resolving disputes.It is found that government guidance and democratic decision-making,inter-ministerial cooperation and hierarchical mediation,and legal and emotional support are important foundations for achieving the goal of resolving disputes.Meanwhile,in the process of resolving disputes,attention should be paid to:standardize the mediation process and put disputes in the cage of the system;Clarify the problem-solving plan and implement effective mediation for the problem;Emphasize trust building and improve the level of trust in collaboration;Strengthen mass autonomy and build a multi-level mediation sequence.

关 键 词：基层治理 行政调解 渐进循环 协作分析 

分 类 号：F812[经济管理—财政学]