检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈莹[1] Chen Ying(Department of Hematology and Oncology,The Second People's Hospital of Hefei,Hefei 230000,China)
机构地区:[1]合肥市第二人民医院血液肿瘤科,安徽合肥230000
出 处:《实用妇科内分泌电子杂志》2024年第1期133-135,共3页Electronic Journal of Practical Gynecological Endocrinology
摘 要:目的探究强化心理干预在卵巢癌患者护理中的应用效果。方法选取72例卵巢癌患者,根据随机抽签法分为两组,每组36例。对照组患者采用常规护理,观察组患者在对照组基础上采用强化心理干预。对比两组患者的心理状态、自护能力评分及生活质量评分。结果观察组干预后焦虑评分、抑郁评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组干预后自护能力评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组干预后生活质量评分为(68.34±8.15)分,高于对照组的(58.54±7.59)分(P<0.05)。结论强化心理干预在卵巢癌患者护理中的应用效果较好,值得临床推广与应用。Objective To explore the effect of intensive psychological intervention in nursing care of patients with ovarian cancer.Methods 72 patients with ovarian cancer were selected and divided into two groups with 36 cases in each group according to random drawing method.Patients in control group received routine nursing,and patients in observation group received intensive psychological intervention on the basis of control group.The psychological state,self-care ability score and quality of life score of the two groups were compared.Results The anxiety scores and depression scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group after intervention(P<0.05).The self-care ability score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).The life quality score of the observation group was(68.34±8.15)points,which was higher than that of the control group(58.54±7.59)points(P<0.05).Conclusion The effect of intensive psychological intervention in nursing care of ovarian cancer patients is good,and it is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3