地方司法解释性文件的身份困惑与出路  

Confusion and Resolution on the Identity of Local Judicial Interpretive Documents

作　　者：姜登峰[1] 唐燕莺 JIANG Dengfeng;TANG Yanying

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法学院 [2]广西河池市人民检察院

出　　处：《经贸法律评论》2024年第2期142-158,共17页Business and Economic Law Review

摘　　要：地方司法解释性文件尽管在我国地方的司法实践中普遍存在,但在实践中其身份一直处于相对尴尬的境地。虽然地方司法解释性文件不具备国家立法层面认可的合法身份,最高人民法院也三令五申地禁止地方法院进行司法解释,但地方司法解释性文件还是被不断地制定出来,成为地方法院裁判的依据,这导致其受到多种非议和多重质疑。在国家法律供给不足和地方治理需求旺盛的矛盾下,地方法院司法解释性文件仍然具有巨大的实践价值,并扮演着非法意义上“法”的角色。从法律性质的角度上看,地方法院司法解释性文件属于广义上的法律解释,具有“可以的法律渊源”之地位,应当成为地方法院法律适用中可供参考的重要依据之一,具备应然“法律性”。Although local judicial interpretive documents are common in local judicial practice in our country,their status has been in a relatively awkward situation in practice.Although local judicial interpretive documents do not have the legal status recognized at the national legislative level,and the Supreme people’s Court has repeatedly prohibited the local court from making judicial interpretion,local judicial interpretive documents are still constantly formulated and become the basis of the local court’s judgment,which leads to a variety of controversies and multiple questions in the formulation.Under the contradiction between the insufficient supply of national laws and the strong demand of local governance,local judicial interpretive documents still have great practical value and play the role of“law”in the illegal sense.From the perspective of legal nature,the judicial interpretive documents of local courts belong to the broad sense of legal interpretation,and have the status of“possible legal sources”,which should be one of the important references for the application of law by local courts,and have the deserved“legality”.

关 键 词：地方司法解释性文件 法律解释 法律渊源 法律性 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学] D927