历史文化保护区保护规划实施效果评估对比研究——以广州小洲村和成都宽窄巷子为例  

Comparative Study on Assessment of Implementation Effect of Conservation Planning in Historical and Cultural Reserves-Taking Guangzhou Xiaozhou Village and Chengdu Kuanzhai Alley as an Example

作　　者：陈由佳 吴浩 CHEN You-jia;Wu Hao(Sichuan Forestry and Grassland Survey and Planning Institute,Chengdu 610081,China)

机构地区：[1]四川省林业和草原调查规划院,四川成都610081

出　　处：《四川林勘设计》2024年第1期20-26,30,共8页Sichuan Forestry Exploration and Design

摘　　要：历史文化保护区是人类宝贵的文化遗产,城市发展规划保护规划一直是人们关注的焦点。为考察规划的作用和影响,我国逐步开展了规划实施评估工作。以广州小洲村和成都宽窄巷子为例,基于其各自的保护规划内容,对两者进行规划实施效果评估对比。研究发现,同为2010年以来兴起的历史文化保护区,两者有着截然不同的发展境地和相差较大的评估结果,小洲村的逐步落寞和宽窄巷子看似的热闹繁华背后都反映着规划的根本问题。文章从传统产业的转型、建筑特色的协调和文化背景的传承三个方面对两者评估结果的原因进行探讨,以寻求改善措施和对策,为未来历史文化保护区规划工作提供参考。Historical and cultural reserves were valuable cultural heritage of mankind,and their conservation planning had always been a focus of attention in urban development planning.In order to examine the role and impact of planning,our country had gradually carried out an evaluation of the implementation of planning.Taked Guangzhou Xiaozhou Village and Chengdu Kuanzhai Alley as examples,the effectiveness of planning implementation was compared based on the contents of their respective conservation plans.The study found that the two historic and cultural reserves,both of which emerged in the 21st century,had very different development situations and widely differing assessment results,reflecting fundamental planning problems behind the gradual decline of Xiaozhou Village and the seemingly bustling prosperity of the Kuanzhai Alley.Following this,the reasons for the two assessment results were explored in this paper from three aspects:transformation of traditional industries,harmonization of architectural features and inheritance of cultural background,in order to seek improvement measures and countermeasures,and to provide a reference basis for the future planning of the historical and cultural preservation area.

关 键 词：保护规划 实施效果 历史文化保护区 评估 

分 类 号：F326.27[经济管理—产业经济]