《民法典》第995条(人格权请求权)评注  

Commentary on Article 995 of the Civil Code(Claims to Personality Rights)

作　　者：朱晓峰[1] Zhu Xiaofeng

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学法学院

出　　处：《荆楚法学》2024年第1期30-42,共13页Jingchu Law Review

摘　　要：《民法典》第995条虽然规定了人格权请求权,但本条并非独立的人格权请求权基础,需要与其他法律规范相结合才能发挥针对具体行为的法律效果评价作用。本条的具体结构决定了其规范作用主要有两个方面:一是提示参引作用。本条第1句是提示参引规范,通过本句可以将人格权侵害民事责任的认定交给那些可以对具体行为展开法律效果评价的法律规定,从而实现了对现行法律体系中人格权侵害民事责任认定规则的体系化处理;二是抗辩排除作用。本条第2句是抗辩排除规范,通过本句可以排除行为人所主张的请求权诉讼时效已经过的抗辩,强化人格权侵害场合非财产性请求权特别是人格权请求权的保护力度,助益民法典充分保护人格权的立法目的之实现。Although Article 995 of the Civil Code stipulates the right to claim personality rights,this article is not an independent basis for the right to claim personality rights,and needs to be combined with other legal norms in order to play the role of evaluating the legal effects of specific acts.The specific structure of this article determines its normative role mainly has two aspects:one is the role of prompt reference,the first sentence of this article is a prompt reference norm;the second is the role of defense exclusion,the second sentence of this article is a defense exclusion norms.Through the second sentence of this article,the defense that the statute of limitations for claims has expired can be excluded,and the protection of non-property claims,especially personality rights,in the case of infringement of personality rights,can be strengthened,which is conducive to the realization of the legislative purpose of the Civil Code to fully protect personality rights.

关 键 词：《民法典》第995条 人格权请求权 绝对权请求权 损害赔偿请求权 诉讼时效 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]