国家与后发现代化的荣枯——基于国家自主性和国家嵌入性的分析  

The Relationship Between the State and the Rise and Fall of Late-modernization:An Analysis Based on State Autonomy and State Embeddedness

作　　者：孙代尧[1] 刁伟琪 Sun Daiyao;Diao Weiqi(School of Marxism,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学马克思主义学院,北京100871

出　　处：《北京大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第2期22-33,共12页Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：国家自主性和国家嵌入性是影响后发国家现代化成败的两个关键要素,但无论是自主性还是嵌入性都很难单独发挥作用。可以通过建构一个国家自主性和国家嵌入性模型,以资源配置为视角、以产业升级和产业结构为中介,来分析国家自主性和国家嵌入性对现代化的影响。经案例研究发现,不同类型的组合决定了后发国家现代化绩效的不同。低自主性、高嵌入性国家难以打破固有利益格局;低自主性、低嵌入性国家则无法阻止资源流向强势集团或分利集团;高自主性、低嵌入性国家倾向于汲取资源用于自身消费或整体的福利消耗;兼具较高程度自主性和嵌入性的国家,能够控制资源流向战略产业和先进产业,更有利于现代化。State autonomy and state embeddedness are two key factors that influence the success or failure of the late-modernization of a country,but neither state autonomy nor state embeddedness can play its role alone.This paper is intended to construct a model of state autonomy and state embeddedness,and analyze their impact on modernization from the perspective of resource allocations,with industrial upgrading and industrial structure as the intermediary.Through the case study,it is found that different types of combinations determine the modernization performance of latecomer countries.It is difficult for the countries with low autonomy and high embeddedness to break the pattern of inherent interests.The countries with low autonomy and low embeddedness cannot prevent their resources from flowing to powerful groups or profit-sharing groups.The countries with high autonomy and low embeddedness tend to draw resources for their own consumption or the overall welfare consumption.And the countries with a high degree of both autonomy and embeddedness can control the resources and make them flow to the strategic and advanced industries,which is more conducive to modernization.

关 键 词：国家自主性 国家嵌入性 后发现代化 资源配置 产业政策 

分 类 号：D034[政治法律—政治学]