检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《新闻大学》2024年第2期87-99,120,121,共15页Journalism Research
摘 要:研究致力于讨论这一问题:智能生成内容是否能成为法律意义上的作品而获得智能著作权保护?以及如何保护?研究基于法哲学视角,通过对著作权制度的哲学意义和价值追求的分析,认为把具有创造性的智能生成内容纳入著作权保护范围,并将相关权利给予人工智能使用者,有利于维护人类社会生存发展的公平与效率。但具有创造性的智能生成内容不完全具备传统著作权“独创性—人身性/财产性”确权要素,有必要通过立法构建“机创性—财产性”确权规则,完善智能著作权保护制度。Whether the content generated by artificial intelligence can become a legal work to obtain intelligent copyright protection and how to protect the content generated by artificial intelligence is becoming a hot topic in academic research.Based on the perspective of philosophy of law,this paper examines the issue of intelligent copyright protection through the philosophical significance and value pursuit of the copyright system:bringing the creative content generated by artificial intelligence into the scope of copyright protection and granting relevant rights to artificial intelligence users is conducive to maintaining the fairness and eficiency of the survival and development of human society.Therefore,it is imperative to confirm the rights of artificial intelligence generated content.However,the creative content generated by artificial intelligence does not fully possess"originality-personality/property"right confirmation elements of the traditional copyright,and using this rule to determine the right of artificial intelligence generated content will encounter a legal dilemma.It is necessary to establish the"machine originality-property"right confirmation rules through legislation to improve the intelligent copyright protection system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222