检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕祚成 LV Zuocheng(State Tobacco Monopoly Administration,Beijing 100045,China)
机构地区:[1]国家烟草专卖局,北京100045
出 处:《中国烟草学报》2024年第2期92-97,共6页Acta Tabacaria Sinica
摘 要:在刑事司法实践中,持有烟草专卖零售许可证的主体违法从事批发经营活动的,认定为“超范围经营”还是“无证经营”,往往关乎罪与非罪的界定,其认定存在争议。本文对90份刑事裁判文书进行实证分析,从法益保护的角度得出结论:对于此类行为,在符合非法经营罪所引述相关行政法规定的基础上,要进一步综合考量主体、行为、对象等构成要件要素是否满足出罪条件,才能在刑事层面准确做出“超范围经营”抑或“无证经营”的判断。In criminal judicial practice,whether the act of a holder of a tobacco retail license illegally engaging in wholesale operations is identified as“beyond the scope of business”or“unlicensed business”often concerns the boundary between crime and non crime,and its determination is controversial.This article conducts an empirical analysis of 90 criminal judgment documents and concludes from the perspective of legal interest protection:for such acts,on the basis of complying with the relevant administrative regulations cited in the crime of illegal business operation,it is necessary to further comprehensively consider whether the constituent elements such as the subject,behavior,and object meet the conditions for committing the crime,in order to accurately make a judgment on“operating beyond the scope”or“operating without a certificate”at the criminal level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.69.134