汉语植物惯用语隐喻转喻现象分析  

Analysis on Phenomenon of Metaphors and Metonymiesof Chinese Plant Locutions

作　　者：吕炳霞 LÜBingxia(School of Culture and Tourism,Quzhou College of Technology,Quzhou 324000,China)

机构地区：[1]衢州职业技术学院文化旅游学院,浙江衢州324000

出　　处：《黎明职业大学学报》2023年第4期15-22,共8页Journal of LiMing Vocational University

基　　金：2023年度衢州职业技术学院校级一般科研课题(QZYY2315)。

摘　　要：根据惯用语中植物部与概念的映射关系,将303例汉语植物惯用语划分为隐喻类、转喻类和隐喻转喻结合类,其中隐喻类占比92.1%,转喻类占比5.78%,隐喻转喻结合类占比2.13%。研究表明,隐喻类植物惯用语远远多于转喻类的原因是植物惯用语语义引申的过程中,隐喻起的作用比转喻更大。隐喻涉及到两个域,可以根据某种相似性将植物域和许多其他认知域相联系。转喻只涉及一个认知域,主要作用是指称,有其局限性。A total of 303 Chinese locutions involving plant names were classified into the metaphorical category,the metonymic category,and the metaphorical-metonymic combination category based on the ways of mapping.It was found that the metaphorical category accounts for 92.1%of the total cases,the metonymic category 5.78%,and the metaphorical-metonymic category 2.13%.The metaphorical plant idioms far outnumbered the metonymic ones since the metaphor plays a greater role in the semantic extension of plant idioms than metonymy.The metaphor involves two domains,which can be linked to the plant domain and many other cognitive domains based on similarities.The metonymy only involves one cognitive domain and its main function is to refer,with its limitations.

关 键 词：认知语言学 概念隐喻 概念转喻 惯用语 植物 

分 类 号：H146.1[语言文字—汉语]