检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赖海鹏 李志刚 于金雨 郑杰辉[1] LAI Haipeng;LI Zhigang;YU Jinyu;ZHENG Jiehui(South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510641,China)
出 处:《山东电力技术》2024年第4期12-26,共15页Shandong Electric Power
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2023ZYGXZR063);国家自然科学基金项目(52177086)。
摘 要:电力系统潮流方程具有显著的非线性特性,针对大规模电力系统的潮流计算易出现计算结果不收敛的现象。近年来,国内外文献涌现出大量适用于电力系统交流潮流计算的线性化潮流模型,但缺乏对经典线性化潮流模型分离变量过程的系统性梳理与总结以及对经典线性化潮流模型计算性能的数值比较。首先梳理了目前电力系统经典线性化潮流模型的主要思路,对各种线性化潮流模型分离变量的过程进行分析与总结。然后对比了线性化潮流模型的相同性及其在输电网和配电网应用上的差异,并从计算误差、计算时间和灵敏度等方面对比了各线性化潮流模型的性能。最后根据每一种线性化潮流模型的优缺点,对各线性化潮流模型的适用场景进行了总结及展望。Power system power flow equations exhibit significant nonlinear characteristics,and non-convergence is common in large-scale power system calculations.Recently,numerous linearized power flow models for AC power flow calculations in power systems have been proposed globally.However,a systematic compilation and summary of the variable separation process in classical linearized power flow models,along with numerical comparisons of their computational performance,are lacking in the literature.In this paper,the key concepts of existing classical linearized power flow models are organized for power systems,and then the variable separation process in these models is analyzed and summarized.Subsequently,the similarities and differences of linearized power flow models are compared in transmission and distribution network applications.Next,the performance of each linearized power flow model is evaluated in terms of computational error,computation time,and sensitivity.Finally,the applicable scenarios of each linearized power flow model is summarized based on their advantages and disadvantages.
分 类 号:TM74[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7