检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张镕楠 杨芳绒[1] 杨俊 杨澜 ZHANG Rongnan;YANG Fangrong;YANG Jun;YANG Lan(College of Landscape Architecture and Art,Henan Agricultural University,Zhengzhou 450002,China;College of Art,Taiyuan University of Technology,Jinzhong,Shanxi 030600,China)
机构地区:[1]河南农业大学风景园林与艺术学院,河南郑州450002 [2]太原理工大学艺术学院,山西晋中030600
出 处:《林业调查规划》2024年第2期25-32,共8页Forest Inventory and Planning
基 金:河南省科技智库项目(HNKJZK-2020-01C)。
摘 要:基于GIS技术,以三门峡市中心城区城市公园为例,利用网络分析法定量评价步行、非机动车、机动车3种交通方式下的公园可达性,并结合可达面积与人口分析比较研究区、各行政区、各行政街道间的差异。结果表明,研究区内公园分布不均,湖滨区公园多、陕州区公园少;研究区公园绿地非机动车和机动车方式下的可达性较好;步行方式下的可达性较差,只有不到36.11%居民可步行30 min内到达相近公园;湖滨区公园绿地可达性要好于陕州区;前进街道、涧河街道、湖滨街道公园的可达性最佳,会兴街道、张湾乡公园的可达性最差。Based on GIS platform,this paper selected the urban park in the central area of Sanmenxia to quantitatively evaluate the park accessibility under three modes of transportation walking,non-motor vehicle and motor vehicle by using network analysis method,and compare the differences among the study area,administrative districts and administrative streets in combination with accessible area and population analysis.The results showed that the parks in the study area were unevenly distributed,with more parks in Hubin District and less parks in Shanzhou district;the accessibility of non-motor vehicles and motor vehicles in the park green space was good;walking accessibility was poor,and less than 36.11% of residents could walk for 30 minutes to reach the nearby park;the accessibility of park green space in Hubin District was better than that in Shanzhou District;Qianjin Street,Jianhe Street and Hubin Street had the best accessibility,while Huixing Street and Zhangwanxiang Park had the worst accessibility.
分 类 号:S759[农业科学—森林经理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4