检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:文铭 李星熠 Wen Ming;Li Xingyi(School of Cyberspace Security and Information Law,Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Chongqing 400060,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院,重庆400060
出 处:《中国科技论坛》2024年第4期106-116,共11页Forum on Science and Technology in China
基 金:教育部人文社科基金项目“跨境数据流动规制研究”(21YJC820039)。
摘 要:目前跨境数据流动尚未形成统一的全球规制体系,中国跨境数据流动领域的法律规制尚未完善。文章试图对跨境数据流动进行探究和本质性分析,建立“自由-规制”张力框架,并以此为抓手,对中国跨境数据流动治理进行检视,分析比较欧盟、美国治理模式,为探索中国治理方向和路径,构建出一套更加规范的、可持续的、中国化的法律体系提出参考建议。中国应在跨境数据流通“自由-规制”框架下坚守国家安全的基点,明确“自由-规制”数据平衡路径,同时探索公私共治的自由激励模式,找寻“自由-规制”框架平衡。At present,a unified global regulatory system for cross-border data flow has not yet been formed,and the legal regulation of cross-border data flow in China remains incomplete.The article attempts to explore and analyze the nature of cross-border data flows,establish a“freedom-regulation”tension framework,and use it as a grip to review the governance of cross-border data flows in China,analyze and compare the governance models of the European Union,the United States,to provide suggestions for exploring the direction and path of governance in China and build a more standardized,sustainable Chinese legal system.China should adhere to the baseline of national security under the framework of“freedom-regulation”of cross-border data flow,clarify the inevitable path of strengthening regulation,and explore the freedom incentive model of public-private governance to find the balance of“freedom-regulation”framework.
分 类 号:D922.17[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33