运用5G通信技术远程程控心脏置入型电子设备的有效性及安全性评价  

Effectiveness and safety evaluation of remote interrogate cardiac implantable electrical devices using 5G communication technology

作　　者：张宏[1] 高海[1] 刘新[1] 穆希娟[1] 史晓东 ZHANG Hong;GAO Hai;LIU Xin;MU Xijuan;SHI Xiaodong(Center for Coronary Artery Disease,Division of Cardiology,Beijing Anzhen Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing Institute of Heart,Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases,Beijing 100029,China)

机构地区：[1]首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院-北京市心肺血管疾病研究所心内科冠心病中心7区,100029

出　　处：《心肺血管病杂志》2024年第3期233-237,243,共6页Journal of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases

摘　　要：目的:探讨与技术服务人员术中现场程控、测试心脏置入型电子设备(cardiac implantable electrical devices,CIEDs)各项参数的常规方式相比,该非接触式远程程控系统在CIEDs置入过程中的的安全性和有效性。方法:本研究为回顾性研究。依照时间顺序,连续分析了自2020年8月至2021年3月,于我院接受CIEDs置入的110例患者,根据术中程控及测试方式,分为常规程控组及非接触组。入选患者中,59例常规组患者由技术服务人员术中现场程控,其余51例非接触组患者通过新型远程非接触系统程控。结果:常规组的开关门频率高于非接触组[(9.8±1.8)vs.(5.8±1.2),P<0.05]。在CIEDs置入期间和术后12个月时,常规组和非接触组之间的设备相关参数差异及手术相关不良事件差异无统计学意义。结论:基于5G通信传输技术的新型非接触性程控系统与传统的程控方法相比,是安全有效的。Objective:To assess the safety and effectiveness of this non-contact remote interrogate system during Cardiac implantable electrical devices(CIEDs)implantation compared with the conventional method of on-site interrogate CIEDs by technical service personnel.Methods:This study is a retrospective study.In chronological order,110 patients who received CIEDs implantation in our hospital from August 2020 to March 2021 were continuously analyzed.According to intraoperative interrogation methods,they were divided into conventional interrogation group and non-contact group.Among the enrolled patients,59 patients in the conventional group were interrogated on-site during the operation by technical service personnel,and the remaining 51 patients in the non-contact group were interrogated through the new remote non-contact system.Results:We found that the door opening and closing frequency of the conventional group was higher than that of the non-contact group[(9.8±1.8)vs.(5.8±1.2),P<0.05].During CIEDs implantation and 12 months after operation,there were no statistical differences in device-related parameters and operation-related adverse events between the conventional group and the non-contact group.Conclusions:Compared with conventional interrogate methods,the new non-contact interrogate system based on 5G communication transmission technology is safe and effective.

关 键 词：心脏置入型电子设备 远程程控 非接触性 新型冠状病毒感染 

分 类 号：R54[医药卫生—心血管疾病]