镜铁山周边铁矿地质特征对比研究  

Comparative Study on Geological Characteristics of Iron Mines around Jingtieshan

作　　者：赵建仓[1,2] 吴雯辉 Zhao Jiancang;Wu Wenhui(Technology Center of Jiuquan Iron and Steel(Group)Corporation;Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Refractory Iron Ore Resource Utilization,Jiayuguan,Gansu,735100)

机构地区：[1]酒钢集团技术中心 [2]甘肃省难选铁矿石资源利用重点实验室,甘肃嘉峪关735100

出　　处：《酒钢科技》2024年第1期5-10,共6页

摘　　要：本文通过镜铁山周边20处铁矿地质特征的对比研究,将镜铁山周边铁矿归为6大类,分别是“桦树沟式”铁矿、“小柳沟式”铁矿、“刃岗沟式”铁矿、“卡瓦式”、“沙龙式”铁矿和“朱龙关式”铁矿。其中“桦树沟式”铁矿、“小柳沟式”铁矿和“刃岗沟式”铁矿工业利用性能评价较好,“沙龙式”铁矿次之,“朱龙关式”最差,“卡瓦式”铁矿工业利用评价有待进一步评价。Based on the comparative study of the geological characteristics of 20 iron deposits around Jingtieshan,it is considered that the iron deposits around Jingtieshan(5205)can be divided into 6 types.They are respectively“Huashugou-type”iron ore“,Xiaoliugou-type”iron ore,“Renganggou-type”iron ore,“Kawa-type”iron ore,“Shalong-type”iron ore and“Zhulongguan-type”iron ore.The industrial utilization performance of“Huashugou-type”iron ore,“Xiaoliugou-type”iron ore and“Renganggou-type”iron ore is better than that of“Shalong-type”iron ore,the evaluation of industrial utilization of“Zhulongguan Type”iron ore is the worst,the industrial utilization of“Kawa type”iron ore needs further evaluation.

关 键 词：铁矿 地质特征 矿床归类 工业利用评价 

分 类 号：P61[天文地球—矿床学]