检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘翔 PAN Xiang(School of Economic Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai,200042,)
出 处:《闽西职业技术学院学报》2024年第1期15-20,共6页Journal of Minxi Vocational and Technical College
摘 要:网络自媒体在传导民意监督司法的同时,也掀起“舆论审判”,侵蚀审判独立、冲击司法公正、动摇司法权威、挑战法治信仰,严重损害司法公信力。究其原因,司法机关审判独立机制、司法权威树立、舆情承担能力、司法公开落实、有效公众参与等内部要素的阙如应该引起注意。科学认识司法公信力与公共舆论相互促进和对立冲突的二元关系,在司法中微观层面培育司法中立公共理性、坚守案件审理法治底线、提升司法舆情应对能力、引导公众良性参与司法,以建构司法公信和公众舆论之间的良性交互关系。While transmitting public opinion to supervise the judiciary,network we-media sets off a public opinion trial,eroding the independence of the trial,impacting judicial justice,shaking judicial authority,challenging the rule of law belief,and seriously damaging the credibility of the judiciary.The reason is that the lack of internal factors such as the independent mechanism of judicial organs,the establishment of judicial authority,the ability to bear public opinion,the implementation of judicial openness and effective public participation should be paid attention to.This paper proposes to scientifically understand the dual relationship between judicial credibility and public opinion,which promotes and conflicts with each other,and at the micro level of justice,to cultivate judicial neutral public reason,adhere to the bottom line of the rule of law in case trial,improve the ability to deal with judicial public opinion,and guide the public to participate in justice,so as to construct a benign interaction between judicial credibility and public opinion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15