在“主体”与“间性”之间——2023年度中国设计学学术思想研究报告  

"Subjectivity"and"Interdisciplinarity"——2023 Academic Thought Research Report on Chinese Design Studies

作　　者：祝帅 

机构地区：[1]北京大学艺术学院

出　　处：《创意与设计》2024年第1期5-11,共7页Creation and Design

基　　金：国家社科基金艺术学重大项目“中国设计艺术学科体系、学术体系、话语体系现状评估及评价标准研究”(23ZD14)。

摘　　要：本文是对2023年度中国设计学界学术思想方面基础理论研究的批判性回顾、解读与反思。研究发现,尽管新工科、交叉学科建设对设计学学术体系和学科格局产生了很大的冲击,但是传统的设计史论研究作为设计学的重要基础,仍然得到了应有的重视,甚至可以看作是交叉学科设计学中“艺术学”这一部分的主导学术范式。然而,受学科发展阶段、从业者规模以及学术共同体建设不完善等掣肘,设计学研究与蓬勃发展的中国设计实践和设计教育相比,仍然显示出明显的滞后性。This article is a critical review,interpretation,and reflection on the fundamental theoretical research in academic thought in the Chinese design community for the year 2023.Research has found that although the construction of new engineering disciplines and interdisciplinary fields has had a significant impact on the academic system and disciplinary structure of design studies,traditional research on design history,as an important foundation of design studies,still receives due attention and can even be seen as the dominant academic paradigm of the"art"part of interdisciplinary design studies.However,due to constraints such as the stage of disciplinary development,the scale of practitioners,and the imperfect construction of academic communities,research in design studies still shows a significant lag compared to the flourishing design practice and education in China.

关 键 词：主体性 学科间性 三大体系 中国设计学 设计史论 

分 类 号：J505[艺术—艺术设计]