人文社会科学评价体系构建的国际镜鉴与中国路径  

Construction of Evaluation System of Humanities and Social Sciences in China Referring to International Experience

作　　者：马茹 MA Ru(Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Evaluation Studies,Beijing 100732,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学评价研究院,北京100732

出　　处：《扬州大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2024年第2期106-116,共11页Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：中国社会科学院创新工程项目“人文社会科学评价政策研究”。

摘　　要：“学术评价体系不够科学”制约了我国人文社会科学的繁荣发展。梳理总结美国、英国、新西兰人文社会科学评价的实践及经验,能够为我国人文社会科学评价体系构建提供镜鉴。具体来说,相关国际经验包括构建完备的法律法规体系、确立以学术质量和社会效益为核心的多维评价标准、制定严格的评议专家遴选制度、确立多元评议主体既相互配合又相互制衡的工作模式、推动评估及监督体系的制度化建设、重视评估机构的绩效动态管理、构建强大的数据分析支持体系等。据此,我国人文社会科学评价要在加强法律法规体系建设、构建具有中国特色的多维评价指标体系、打造评价主体多元且权力结构科学的评议格局、全方位开展监督检查、完善数据库建设及信息系统集成等方面进一步完善。The inadequacy of the academic evaluation system restricts the development and prosperity of humanities and social sciences in China.An insight is offered for improving our evaluation system of humanities and social sciences by referring to the practice in the United States,the United Kingdom and New Zealand.The international experience includes building up a complete legal system,setting up multidimensional evaluating criteria,formulating a strict rule of selecting review experts,establishing a working mode with reviewers cooperating with and balancing each other,boosting institutionalized evaluation and supervision system,emphasizing the dynamic performance management of the evaluation institutions,and constructing a strong data analysis support system.Accordingly,China s evaluation system needs improvement in its system of laws and regulations,evaluation index system,structure of review experts,supervision over the evaluation,database construction and information system.

关 键 词：人文社会科学评价 美国 英国 新西兰 

分 类 号：G350[文化科学—情报学]