检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟志聪 赫俊国 吴学伟 袁永钦 尹文选 谭俊杰 张道义 吴雨晴 ZHONG Zhicong;HE Junguo;WU Xuewei;YUAN Yongqin;YIN Wenxuan;TAN Junjie;ZHANG Daoyi;WU Yuqing(School of Civil Engineering,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510000,China;Guangzhou Water Investment Group Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou 510655,China;Guangzhou Municipal Water Supply Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou 510600,China;Guangzhou Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou 510095,China)
机构地区:[1]广州大学土木工程学院,广州510000 [2]广州市水务投资集团有限公司,广州510655 [3]广州市自来水有限公司,广州510600 [4]广州市市政工程设计研究总院有限公司,广州510095
出 处:《给水排水》2024年第3期1-11,共11页Water & Wastewater Engineering
摘 要:以南方某流域水体可检出的SD、SMZ、HCB、马拉硫磷和BPA等新污染物为研究对象,进行复合新污染物共存的原水加标处理试验,研究预处理-常规处理-臭氧活性炭工艺处理效果。结果表明,SD、SMZ、BPA与COD_(Mn)均具有较好的相关性;生物预处理工艺对SD、SMZ、HCB、马拉硫磷和BPA去除率分别为23.97%、21.20%、6.08%、16.26%和23.76%,生物预处理最优停留时间是120min,最优气水比是1:2;常规处理工艺对SD、SMZ、HCB、马拉硫磷和BPA的去除率分别为18.02%、20.08%、23.02%、8.26%和16.53%,常规处理中SMZ和马拉硫磷的混凝剂最佳投加量为15mg/L,其余3种新污染物的混凝剂最佳投加量为20mg/L;深度处理工艺对SD、SMZ、HCB、马拉硫磷和BPA的去除率分别为49.13%、53.80%、60.20%、77.07%和71.50%,深度处理最佳臭氧投加量是3mg/L,最佳臭氧接触时间为24min,最优炭床停留时间是25min。试验工艺对复合新污染物具有良好的去除作用,对SD、SMZ、HCB、马拉硫磷和BPA的总去除率达到了69.86%、73.10%、73.65%、83.74%和82.72%,试验条件下出水的HCB、马拉硫磷和BPA满足《生活饮用水卫生标准》(GB5749-2022),出水的磺胺嘧啶和磺胺二甲嘧啶满足欧美发达国家的水质标准。Taking emerging pollutants such as SD,SMZ,HCB,malathion,and BPA that can be detected in a water basin in the south as the research object,a composite new pollutant co existing raw water spiking treatment experiment was conducted to study the treatment effect of pretreatment+conventional treatment+ozone activated carbon process.The results indicate that SD,SMZ,BPA and COD_(mn) all have good correlation.The removal rates of SD,SMZ,HCB,malathion,and BPA by the biological pretreatment process are 23.97%,21.20%,6.08%,16.26%,and 23.76%,respectively.The optimal residence time for biological pretreatment is 120 minutes,and the optimal gas water ratio is 1:2.The removal rates of SD,SMZ,HCB,malathion,and BPA by conventional treatment processes are 18.02%,20.08%,23.02%,8.26%,and 16.53%,respectively.The optimal dosage of coagulants for SMZ and malathion in conventional treatment is 15 mg/L,while the optimal dosage of coagulants for the other three new pollutants is 20 mg/L;The removal rates of SD,SMZ,HCB,malathion,and BPA by the deep treatment process are 49.13%,53.80%,60.20%,77.07%,and 71.50%,respectively.The optimal ozone dosage for deep treatment is 3 mg/L,the optimal ozone contact time is 24 minutes,and the optimal carbon bed retention time is 25 minutes.The experimental process has a good removal effect on composite new pollutants,with a total removal rate of 69.86%,73.10%,73.65%,83.74%,and 82.72%for SD,SMZ,HCB,malathion,and BPA.Under the experimental conditions,the HCB,malathion,and BPA in the effluent are better than the indicators specified in the Sanitary Standards for Drinking Water(GB 5749-2022),and the sulfamethoxazole and sulfamethoxazole in the effluent are better than the water quality indicators required by developed countries in Europe and America.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38