检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘中艳[1] 胡守辰 LIU Zhongyan;HU Shouchen(College of Business,Hunan University of Technology,Zhuzhou Hunan 412007,China)
出 处:《湖南工业大学学报》2024年第3期80-87,共8页Journal of Hunan University of Technology
基 金:教育部高校人文社会科学基金资助项目(20YJC630137);湖南省哲学社会科学基金资助项目(18JD25);湖南省教育厅科研基金资助重点项目(22A0403);湖南省教育厅优秀青年科研基金资助项目(23B0570);株洲市社会科学基金资助课题(ZZSK2023077)。
摘 要:为探究人才引进政策对城市创新绩效的影响,收集中国65个大中城市2011—2019年面板数据,采用多期双重差分法进行实证检验。研究发现,人才引进政策对城市创新绩效的提升效果明显;中介效应分析结果表明,人才引进政策通过优化城市人才存量和人才结构影响城市的创新绩效;异质性分析结果表明,人才引进政策对一、二线城市的创新绩效的提升作用要强于三、四线城市;对东部城市的创新绩效提升作用强于中部和西部城市;对高校资源较好的城市创新绩效的提升作用强于高校资源一般的城市。In view of an investigation of the relationship between talent introduction policies and urban innovation performance,an empirical test has been made of the relationship by adopting a multi-period differences in differences method based on a panel data of 65 large and medium-sized cities in China from 2011 to 2019.Research has found that talent introduction policies have a significant effect on the improvement of urban innovation performance,while the intermediary effect analysis results indicate that talent introduction policies affect the innovation performance of cities with an optimization of their talent stock and structure.The results of a heterogeneity analysis show that the talent introduction policy has a stronger effect on innovation performance in first-and second-tier cities than in third-and fourth-tier cities;the improvement effect on innovation performance is stronger in eastern cities than in central and western cities,as well as in cities with better university resources than those with average university resources.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222