Shifting the paradigm:A critical review of social innovation literature  

作　　者：Amy Phillips Rosalie Luo Joel Wendland-Liu 

机构地区：[1]Social Innovation Program,Grand Valley State University,Grand Rapids,49504,USA [2]Ivey School of Business,Western University,PLondon,N6A 0E1,Canada [3]Social Innovation Program,Grand Valley State University,Allendale,49401,USA

出　　处：《International Journal of Innovation Studies》2024年第1期45-58,共14页国际创新研究学报（英文）

摘　　要：In this review of ten years of social innovation research(2012e2022),we define and explore three paradigms in the field:instrumentalist,strong,and democratic.We investigate how language usage and geography play a central role in identifying which paradigms recently published scholarship falls into.While we do not insist that sharp divisions exist between each paradigm,we do find that on the“instrumentalist”side,language tends to abstract or neutralize power relations.Further,these perspectives tend to derive from Western or Eurocentric orientations or biases.The“strong”paradigm accepts the necessity of institutional and stakeholder engagement and seeks to engage socially excluded populations.In contrast,geographical diversity,attendance to historicized and systemic inequalities,and elevation of the most marginalized communities are more likely to be centered in the“democratic”paradigm.We apply this discussion to recent research in arts-related social innovation and the related field of social entrepreneurship.

关 键 词：Social innovation CULTURE ARTS Social entrepreneurship ETHNOCENTRISM 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学] C933.4[经济管理—管理学] C912.2