Research foresight in bridging open science and open innovation:Overview based on the complex thinking paradigm  

作　　者：Jorge Sanabria-Z Marco Cruz-Sandoval Athziri Moreno-Romo Sofía Bosch-Gómez María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya 

机构地区：[1]Institute for the Future of Education,Tecnologico de Monterrey,Zapopan,45201,Mexico [2]Central Bohemian Innovation Center(SIC),Prague,Czech Republic [3]The Burnes Center for Social Change,Northeastern University,Boston,MA,02115,USA [4]Institute for the Future of Education,Tecnologico de Monterrey,Monterrey,64700,Mexico

出　　处：《International Journal of Innovation Studies》2024年第1期59-75,共17页国际创新研究学报（英文）

基　　金：the financial support of Tecnologico de Monterrey through the“Challenge-Based Research Funding Program 2022”.Project ID#I001-IFE001-C1-T1-E.

摘　　要：Open innovation benefits from access to cutting-edge discoveries to increase their transformation into tangible applications for the benefit of society.Improving research quality has been proposed as a primary objective of open science by the United Nations,to increase science reproducibility,impact,and trust,leading to robust decision-making and policies.However,opening access to data and processes is insufficient for researchers to achieve open innovation in the context of globalization,for example,by gathering insights from external and internal sources.Developing the appropriate mindset to manage complexity and generate synergy among researchers in academia,industry,and the government is essential to catalyze knowledge and transform it into relevant innovations for society.To gain insights into the roles and challenges of researchers aiming to bridge the gap between open science and open innovation,a decade-plus Mapping Literature Review was conducted based on the complex thinking paradigm.Complex thinking allows for novel connections of the information collected through open science and open innovation,considering different forms of engaging with alternative means of knowledge creation that may promote innovative and critical thinking.The findings revealed:a)broad positioning of the terms in the European Union;b)open access and open data as current driving themes;c)a constant trade-off between the terms“open data”and“information protection”;d)lack of studies on researchers’complex thinking to help them manage openness;e)absence of the environmental helix in the initiatives;and(f)challenges in innovative communication and collaborative practices among public and private entities.Overall,we identified an opportunity to develop researchers’complex thinking such that the openness of information becomes a shared responsibility among partners across multiple helices.This shared responsibility can have methodological implications that permeate how open science and open innovation are theorized and,in pr

关 键 词：Open innovation Open science Complex thinking ECOSYSTEMS Research enhancement Educational innovation Higher education 

分 类 号：F113[经济管理—国际贸易]