新世纪现实主义文论话语新变与视角转换——兼论几种理论视角的指向性  

New Changes in the Discourse and Perspective of Realist Literature in the New Century——Discussing the directionality of several theoretical perspectives

作　　者：孙立武 SUN Li-wu(School of Humanities and Law,YANSHAN University,Qinhuangdao 066004,China)

机构地区：[1]燕山大学文法学院,河北秦皇岛066004

出　　处：《华北电力大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第2期99-107,共9页Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：现实主义理论裹挟着90年代的激情和理想的“消逝”诗学进入到了新千禧年,新世纪的前十年将那种世纪末的焦虑转变为了自我隐遁与祛魅,不同话语主体曾经信心满满地建构的权威话语被搁置且不再被信任。直至2011年,阎连科以“神实主义”这一带有颠覆性的概念撬动了长期以来对于现实主义的传统认知。尔后,在后理论的语境中,符号学视野、科学主义视野、文体哲学视野以及新媒介所带来的新的认知模式试图从文本实践和理论阐释的不同角度重建现实主义理论批评的有效性。本文基于新世纪的理论语境,聚焦于现实主义在新世纪的讨论,结合相关的现实主义文本实践,梳理现实主义理论在新世纪的话语新变,并探讨现实主义理论的文体路径以及内转指向。The first decade of the new century transformed the anxieties of the end of the century into self-avoidance and demystification,and the authoritative discourse once confidently constructed by different discourse subjects was shelved and no longer trusted.It was not until 2011 that Yan Lianke pried up the longstanding traditional perception of realism with the subversive concept of"divine realism".Then,in the posttheoretical context,the semiotic vision,the scientistic vision,the stylistic-philosophical vision,and the new cognitive model brought by the new media tried to rebuild the validity of realist theoretical criticism from different perspectives of textual practices and theoretical interpretations.Based on the theoretical context of the new century,this paper focuses on the discussion of realism in the new century,combines the relevant realist textual practices,sorts out the new changes in the discourse of realist theory in the new century,and explores the stylistic path and the internal turning point of realist theory.

关 键 词：新世纪 现实主义 话语新变 文体哲学 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]