检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘书文 庄乾龙[1] Liu Shuwen;Zhuang Qianlong(College of Humanities and Social Sciences of Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083 China)
机构地区:[1]北京林业大学人文社会科学学院,北京100083
出 处:《安徽冶金科技职业学院学报》2024年第1期55-56,61,共3页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Metallurgy and Technology
摘 要:由于实务中案件情况复杂,加之法律本身固有的滞后性,行为人的过度维权行为与敲诈勒索罪之间存在着一条并不明晰的界限。为厘清过度维权与敲诈勒索罪的边界,通过研究相关案例,分析实务中过度维权入刑的司法现状,从知假买假者的身份认定、维权依据、索赔数额和维权手段几个角度解构司法认定争议,尝试划清两者界限。过度维权行为与敲诈勒索罪的界限认定,应当在法益价值衡量与刑法谦抑性原则的基础上,综合考虑市场秩序现状、公众法治意识、维权成本与权利救济途径,谨慎入罪。Due to the complexity of the cases in practice and the inherent lag of the law itself, there is an unclear boundary between the perpetrator's excessive rights protection and the crime of extortion.In order to clarify the boundary between the crime of excessive rights protection and extortion, this paper analyzes the judicial status quo of excessive rights protection into punishment in practice by studying relevant cases, deconstructs the disputes over judicial recognition from the perspectives of identity identification,basis of rights protection,amount of claim and means of rights protection,and tries to draw a clear line between the two on this basis.On the basis of the measurement of legal interest.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.226.170