刑事被害人精神损害赔偿金的司法检视与反思——以涉刑事机动车交通事故纠纷案件为分析样本  

Judicial Review and Reflection on the Compensation for Mental Damage to Criminal Victims:With a Focus on Cases Involving Criminal Motor Vehicle Traffic Accident Disputes

作　　者：赵永刚 ZHAO Yonggang(Tongzhou District People s Court,Nantong,Jiangsu,China 226300)

机构地区：[1]通州区人民法院金融审判庭,江苏通州226300

出　　处：《昆明学院学报》2024年第2期63-71,共9页Journal of Kunming University

摘　　要：在人身损害侵权案件中,精神损害赔偿金作为受害者因精神利益减损而获得的金钱补偿,在受害者损失明细中具有独特的价值地位。而在侵权人被追究刑事责任的情况下,受害人是否仍有权主张精神损害赔偿金,理论中存在拒斥与容受两种观点;刑事与民事法律体系的规定也截然不同,前者规定对该项主张一般不予受理,而后者则明确表达了支持观点。法律规定的不一致导致司法中广泛出现了同案异判的现象。文章以交通事故案件为例对刑事被害人精神损害赔偿金问题进行实证考察,归纳梳理出两种观点在司法中的具体表现及法律适用的区别。通过批判性分析拒斥观点的弊端及容受观点的正当性,进而对刑事被害人精神损害赔偿金制度进行完善。In personal injury tort cases,compensation for mental damage serves as a financial remedy for the victim s decreasing spiritual interests,holding a unique value in the detailed calculation of the victim s losses.When the tortfeasor is held criminally responsible,there is a theoretical debate between two views on whether the victim is still entitled to claim compensation for mental damage:one rejects the claim,while the other receive it.The criminal and civil legal systems have distinct provisions on this matter;the former generally does not accept such claims,while the latter explicitly supports the victim s right to claim.The inconsistency in legal provisions has led to widespread disparities in judicial decisions.This paper takes motor vehicle traffic accident cases as an example to empirically examine the issue of compensation for mental damage to criminal victims,summarizing and organizing the specific manifestations of the two views in judicial practice and the differences in legal application.Through critical analysis of the drawbacks of the rejection view and the legitimacy of the receptivity view,the paper further suggests improvements to the system of compensation for mental damage to criminal victims.

关 键 词：精神损害赔偿金 刑事责任 拒斥说 容受说 

分 类 号：D920.5[政治法律—法学]