检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:狄艾芳 李建强 DI Aifang;LI Jianqiang(Pinghu Agricultural Products Quality and Safety Center,Pinghu 314200,Zhejiang;Plant Protection Soil and Fertilizer Technology Extension Center of Pinghu City,Pinghu 314200,Zhejiang)
机构地区:[1]平湖市农产品质量安全中心,浙江平湖314200 [2]平湖市植保土肥技术推广中心,浙江平湖314200
出 处:《浙江农业科学》2024年第4期830-833,共4页Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences
摘 要:试验设计了在水稻等氮情况下不同缓释肥的肥效对比试验。试验表明,施用缓释肥能够在减少一次分蘖肥的前提下,取代农户传统施用化肥模式,达到省工节本、增产增效的目的。但不同品牌缓释肥之间由于养分配方、缓释工艺存在差异,田间施用效果有所不同。好乐耕与多益成2个品牌缓释肥增产作用相对优于其他2个缓释肥品牌。In this experiment,a comparative test of fertilizer efficiency of different slow-release fertilizers in rice under the condition of equal nitrogen was designed.The results showed that the application of slow-release fertilizer can replace the traditional application of chemical fertilizer by farmers on the premise of reducing the primary tillering fertilizer,so as to save labor and cost,increase yield and efficiency.However,due to the differences in nutrient distribution and slow-release processes between different brands of slow-release fertilizers,the field application effects are different.In this experiment,the yield increase effect of Haolegeng and Duoyicheng slow-release fertilizer were relatively better than that of the other two slow-release fertilizer brands.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.221.111