检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:全嘉琪 葛幼松[1] 李佩叶 QUAN Jiaqi;GE Yousong;LI Peiye
机构地区:[1]南京大学建筑与城市规划学院
出 处:《现代城市研究》2024年第3期72-79,共8页Modern Urban Research
摘 要:村民主体对于乡村治理绩效的评价,是乡村治理工作的重要考核方式。文章基于村民主体视角,运用问卷调查和数理分析法对南京市江宁区3种不同乡村治理模式典型村庄进行绩效评价研究,结果表明:由于参与主体不同,3种治理模式在发展路径等方面存在较大差异;各模式在应用中均取得一定成效,但也存在多元主体交流不畅等共性问题,相较而言政府参与度高的治理模式更受村民信赖;要实现乡村可持续发展,各村需进一步完善多元主体合作机制。The evaluation of the performance of rural governance by villagers is an important way to assess rural governance.Based on the perspective of villagers,questionnaire survey and mathematical analysis were utilized in this paper to evaluate the performance of three typical villages with different rural governance modes in Jiangning district,Nanjing.The results indicate that due to the different participants,there are great differences in the development paths of the three governance models.Each model has achieved certain results in the application,however,there are also shared problems such as poor communication among multiple subjects.In comparison,the governance model with high government participation is more trusted by villagers.In order to realize the sustainable development of rural areas,all villages need to further improve the multi-subject cooperation mechanism.
分 类 号:TU984[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222