检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王奕菲 WANG Yi-fei
机构地区:[1]西北政法大学法学院
出 处:《河北法律职业教育》2024年第2期111-115,共5页
摘 要:统计行政处罚作为强化统计监督、依法治统的有力抓手,对深化统计管理体制改革、防范惩治统计造假具有威慑力和良性引导作用。但现时统计行政处罚过程中存在处罚种类单一、处罚缺乏监管、程序违法等现象,由此引发的一系列问题有待探索。通过制度建设完善和系统体制改革推动统计行政处罚,是现存问题解决的重要路径。完善统计行政处罚制度并非一朝一夕之事,如何在情与法、人与统计之间建立良好沟通的桥梁,仍是统计事业与法治工作的研究所向。The administrative punishment in statistics serves as a powerful means to strengthen statistical supervision and rule-based governance,playing a deterrent and guiding role in deepening the reform of statistical management systems and preventing and combating statistical fraud.However,there are currently issues in the process of statistical administrative punishment,such as the lack of variety in penalties,insufficient supervision over penalties,and procedural violations,which have led to a series of problems that need to be explored.Enhancing the system construction and promoting systemic reform of statistical administrative penalties are important paths to address these existing problems.Improving the statistical administrative punishment system is not an overnight task.How to establish a good communication bridge between reality and law,and between people and statistics,remains a research direction for both the statistical profession and legal governance work.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.122.53