公司“控制人”信义义务规则的创设及适用研究  

Research on the Establishment and Application of the Fiduciary Duty Rules for Company Controllers

作　　者：赵玲[1] Zhao Ling

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学法学院,北京100029

出　　处：《法学杂志》2024年第2期160-172,共13页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：在公司制度的发展中,从所有权为股权概念所修正,到表决权从股权中的分离,再到控制权从表决权中的提炼,对控制权的界定与剖析,以及对控制人行使控制权进行规制,逐渐成为公司法制度设计遵循的基本准则。有别于旧《公司法》的规定,新《公司法》并未明确将股东排除在实际控制人之外,但在表述上仍将实际控制人、控股股东、董监高作为各自独立的主体分别界定,并设定了不同的信义义务。该分别界定的模式忽视了上述主体之间可能存在的交叉与重合,其实质在于未能有效关注控制权这一根本。应基于实际控制人的概念提炼出控制人这一术语,并设定其信义义务的适用与填补规则,以保障非控制人的合法权益。In the development of the company system,from the replacement of the concept of"ownership"by"equity",to the separation of"voting rights"from"equity",and then to the refinement of"control power"from"voting rights",the definition and analysis of"control pow-er",as well as the regulation of the exercise of control by controllers,have gradually become the basic principles that should be followed in the design of the company law system.Different from the provisions of the old Company Law,the new Company Law does not explicitly exclude"share-holders"from"actual controllers",but still defines the"actual controllers","controlling share-holders",directors,supervisors,and senior executives as their own independent entities and sets different fiduciary duties.The model which defines separately overlooks the possible intersections and overlaps between the above entities,essentially due to a failure to effectively focus on the fundamental issue of"control power".The term"controller"should be refined based on the con-cept of"actual controller",and the rules for the application and filling of its fiduciary duty should be established to protect the legitimate rights and interests of"non-controllers"of the company.

关 键 词：控制权 控制人 信义义务 

分 类 号：D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学]