检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王业亮 WANG Ye-liang
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学经济学院
出 处:《河北学刊》2024年第3期208-216,共9页Hebei Academic Journal
摘 要:《个人信息保护法》具有公私法融合的属性,采取何种治理框架成为亟待解决的理论与实践问题。欧盟、美国与中国的个人信息保护均形成了合作治理的基础框架。个人信息保护法的关注重点在于信息主体与信息处理者之间的持续性不平等以及信息处理关系的外部性,因而与劳动法、消费者权益保护法等倾斜保护型法构成家族相似。应参照倾斜保护型法的既有制度经验,进一步构建《个人信息保护法》公私法协同的合作治理框架。具体而言,可从自由主义家长制的告知同意制度、公共信托制度与公益诉讼制度三个方面进行重构。The Personal Information Protection Law possesses the attribute of integrating public and private law,and the urgent theoretical and practical issue lies in determining what governance framework to adopt.The personal information protection frameworks in the European Union,the United States,and China have all formed the basic framework of cooperative governance.The focus of the Personal Information Protection Law lies in the enduring inequality and externalities of the relationship between information subjects and information processors,which bears family resemblance to preferred protectionlaws such as labor law and consumer protection law.The Personal Information Protection Law should draw on the institutional experience of preferred protectionlaws and further construct a collaborative governance framework integrating public and private law.Specifically,this involves reconstructing the informed consent system under a liberal paternalistic approach,establishing a public trust system,and implementing a public interest litigation system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7