检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘亚科 Pan Yake(Public Health Department,Yuyao Lubu Center Health Center,Yuyao 315420,Zhejiang Province,China)
机构地区:[1]余姚市陆埠中心卫生院公共卫生科,浙江余姚315420
出 处:《中外医药研究》2024年第6期69-71,共3页JOURNAL OF CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICINE AND PHARMACY RESEARCH
摘 要:目的:分析社区精神卫生慢性病创新管理在精神疾病患者中的应用效果。方法:选取2021年3月—2023年2月于余姚市陆埠中心卫生院行精神卫生慢性病管理的精神疾病患者132例作为研究对象,随机分为常规管理组和精卫创新组,各66例。常规管理组实施常规慢性病管理服务,精卫创新组在常规管理组基础上给予社区精神卫生慢性病创新管理措施。比较两组精神病性症状、社交能力和生活质量。结果:干预前,两组阳性量表、阴性量表、一般精神病理量表评分和总分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,两组阳性量表、阴性量表、一般精神病理量表评分和总分低于干预前,且精卫创新组低于常规管理组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前,两组社交技能量表(SSC)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,两组SSC评分低于干预前,且精卫创新组低于常规管理组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前,两组健康状况调查简表(SF-36)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,两组SF-36评分高于干预前,且精卫创新组高于常规管理组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:社区精神卫生慢性病创新管理在精神疾病患者中的应用效果显著,可缓解患者精神病性症状,提高社交能力与生活质量。Objective:To analyze the application effect of community mental health chronic disease innovative management in patients with mental illness.Methods:A total of 132 patients with mental illness who received chronic disease management were selected as the study objects in Yuyao Lubu Central Health Center from March 2021 to February 2023,and were randomly divided into routine management group and mental health innovation group,with 66 cases in each group.The routine management group implemented the routine chronic disease management service,and the mental health Innovation Group implemented the community mental health chronic disease innovative management measures on the basis of the routine management group.Psychotic symptoms,social skills and quality of life were compared between the two groups.Results:Before intervention,there was no significant difference in the scores and total scores of positive scale,negative scale and general psychopathology scale between the two groups(P>0.05);after intervention,the scores and total scores of positive scale,negative scale and general psychopathology scale of the two groups were lower than before intervention,and the mental health innovation group was lower than the routine management group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before intervention,there was no significant difference in social skills Scale(SSC)scores between the two groups(P>0.05);after intervention,the SSC scores of the two groups were lower than before intervention,and the mental health innovation group was lower than the routine management group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before intervention,there was no significant difference in SF-36 scores between the two groups(P>0.05);after intervention,the SF-36 scores of the two groups were higher than before intervention,and the mental health innovation group was higher than the routine management group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The application of community mental health chronic disease
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62