检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王尧鸿[1,2] 张宇 姜丽云 李志强[3] 董伟 张巍[5] WANG Yaohong;ZHANG Yu;JIANG Liyun;LI Zhiqiang;DONG Wei;ZHANG Wei(School of Civil Engineering,Inner Mongol University of Technology,Hohhot 010051,China;Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Structure and Mechanics,Hohhot 010051,China;School of Water Conservancy and Construction Engineering,Shihezi University,Shihezi 832003 China;College of Civil Engineering,Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology,Baotou 014010,China;Bayannaoer Power Supply Branch of Inner Mongolia Power(Group)Co.,Ltd,Bayannaoer 015000,China)
机构地区:[1]内蒙古工业大学土木工程学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010051 [2]内蒙古自治区土木工程结构与力学重点试验室,内蒙古呼和浩特市010051 [3]石河子大学石河子大学水利建筑工程学院,新疆石河子832003 [4]内蒙古科技大学土木工程学院,内蒙古包头014010 [5]内蒙古电力(集团)有限责任公司巴彦淖尔供电分公司,内蒙古巴彦淖尔015000
出 处:《世界地震工程》2024年第2期45-54,共10页World Earthquake Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51868059);内蒙古自然科学基金项目(2021MS05022);内蒙古自治区直属高校基本科研业务费项目(JY20220005)。
摘 要:为研究玻璃粉等质量取代20%水泥与风积沙等质量取代30%天然砂对混凝土柱抗震性能的影响,本文设计和制作4根混凝土柱试件。第1根是普通混凝土柱,第2根是玻璃粉等质量取代20%水泥的混凝土柱,第3根是风积沙等质量取代30%河砂的混凝土柱,第4根是同时用玻璃粉和风积沙分别等质量取代20%水泥和30%河砂的混凝土柱。通过低周往复荷载试验,对比分析各个试件的破坏形态、承载力、滞回性能、骨架曲线、耗能能力、延性系数、刚度退化规律和变形特点。结果表明:20%取代率的玻璃粉取代水泥和30%取代率的风积沙取代天然河砂均能提高混凝土柱的抗震性能,降低构件破坏程度;基于试验结果、Fajfar和Park-Ang提出的地震损伤模型,对其耗能因子β进行修正,得到了修正后的Park-Ang损伤模型,并与废弃玻璃粉风积沙混凝土柱的试验过程吻合较好。In order to study the effect of replacing 20%cement with mass such as glass powder and 30%natural sand with mass such as wind-deposited sand on the seismic performance of concrete columns,this paper designed and produced 4 concrete column specimens.The first one is an ordinary concrete column,the second one is a concrete column with 20%of cement replaced by glass powder and other mass,the third one is a concrete column with 30%of river sand replaced by windy sand and other mass,and the fourth one is also made of glass powder.Concrete columns that replace 20%cement and 30%river sand with equal mass and aeolian sand respectively.Through the low-cycle reciprocating load test,the failure form,bearing capacity,hysteretic performance,skeleton curve,energy dissipation capacity,ductility coefficient,stiffness degradation law and deformation characteristics of each specimen were comparatively analyzed.The results show that:replacing cement with 20%substitution rate of glass powder and replacing natural river sand with 30%substitution rate of aeolian sand can improve the seismic performance of concrete columns and reduce the degree of component damage;based on the test results and the method proposed by Fajfar and Park-Ang For the earthquake damage model,the energy dissipation factor“β”was corrected,and the modified Park-Ang damage model was obtained,which was in good agreement with the test process of the abandoned glass powder aeolian sand concrete columns.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.102.182