主观空虚感量表在中国大学生中的信效度检验  

Validity and Reliability of Subjective Emptiness Scale in Chinese College Students

作　　者：付聪聪 熊紫欣 杨强[3] 叶宝娟[1] 沈慧欣 FU Cong-cong;XIONG Zi-xin;YANG Qiang;YE Bao-juan;SHEN Hui-xin(School of Psychology,Positive Psychological Development Research Center,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022,China;School of Psychology,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060,China;School of Education,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022,China;College of Finance,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022,China)

机构地区：[1]江西师范大学心理学院,江西师范大学积极心理发展研究中心,南昌330022 [2]深圳大学心理学院,深圳518060 [3]江西师范大学教育学院,南昌330022 [4]江西师范大学财政金融学院,南昌330022

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2024年第2期304-308,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(72164018);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(22YJA190012)。

摘　　要：目的:对主观空虚感量表(subjective emptiness scale, SES)进行中文版修订,检验其信效度和跨性别的测量等值性。方法:采用中文版主观空虚感量表对2516名大学生进行调查,以简式Barratt冲动量表(BBIS)、流调中心抑郁量表(CES-D)、生命意义感量表(3IML)以及人格诊断问卷(PDQ-4+)作为效标量表。结果:(1)项目分析表明量表5个条目均具有良好的区分度,各条目与总分的相关在0.80~0.87之间;(2)验证性因子分析结果支持单维度结构:CFI=0.99, TLI=0.99, SRMR=0.01, RMSEA=0.07;(3)量表在不同性别的群体间满足测量等值性;(4)信度分析表明,量表Cronbach’s α系数为0.90,分半信度为0.84,间隔两周的重测信度为0.82;(5)效标关联效度分析显示,空虚感与冲动呈正相关,与抑郁呈正相关,与生命意义感呈负相关,与边缘型人格障碍症状呈正相关;(6)人口学变量分析表明,大学生空虚感得分存在显著的性别差异和年级差异。结论:中文版主观空虚感量表具有良好的信效度,且测量结果可以在不同性别大学生之间进行跨组比较,可以作为评估我国大学生群体主观空虚感的有效工具。Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Subjective Emptiness Scale(SES)in Chinese college stu-dents,and investigate its measurement invariance across gender.Methods:A sample of 2516 Chinese college students were recruited.The Brief Barratt Impulsivity Scale(BBIS),The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale(CES-D),Indicators of Meaning in Life(3IML)and Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire(PDQ-4+)were selected as criterion-re-lated indicators.Results:5 items all had good differentiation,and the correlation between item and the total score ranged from 0.80 to 0.87.②CFA results supported the single-dimensional structure:CFI=0.99,TLI=0.99,SRMR=0.01 and RMSEA=0.07.③Measurement invariance analysis showed that the factor structure of the SES was equivalent across genders.The reliability analysis showed that the Cronbach'sαof the SES was O.90,the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.84,and the test-retest reliability for two weeks was 0.82.Criteria-related validity test showed that emptiness was positively correlated with impulsiveness,depression,and borderline personality disorder,and negatively correlated with meaning in life.@According to demographic variables,students of different gender and different grade had significantly dif-ferent scores.Conclusion:The Chinese version of the SES has good reliability and validity,and the measurement results can be compared across college students of different genders,which can be used as an effective tool to research the empti-ness in Chinese college students.

关 键 词：空虚感 信度 效度 大学生 测量等值性 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]