检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林华东 LIN Huadong
出 处:《城市发展研究》2024年第3期I0001-I0005,共5页Urban Development Studies
基 金:江苏省社会科学基金一般项目“行政处罚权下放镇街制度的江苏实践与优化策略研究”(23FXB002)。
摘 要:行政处罚具有多重面向特质,作为国家治理工具的重要组成部分,事关国家治理体系和治理能力的现代化。《行政处罚法》第24条第1款规定行政处罚权下放乡镇人民政府/街道办事处行使制度,论文从行政主体维度阐释其理论逻辑,立足法律规范检视省实践,发现下放决定主体不具体、承接条件不明晰、下放权力标准不明确、下放程序不健全、法制审核能力不匹配等五个困境。研究认为,应当着重从明确省级政府为下放决定主体、细化乡镇街道承接条件、厘清下放权力标准、完善权力下放程序、强化法制审核能力建设等五个方面进行优化,以期实现制度效能最大化。Administrative penalties have multiple characteristics,and as an important component of national governance tools,they are related to the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity.Article 24,Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Penalty Law stipulates the system of delegating administrative penalty power to Townships People's(Sub-district oflice)Government.This paper elabrates its theoretical logic from the perspective of administrative subjects,and examines the practice of J Province based on legal norms.five dilemmas were found:the decision-making body for delegation is not specific,the conditions for acceptance are not clear,the standards for delegation of power are not clear,the delegation process is not sound,and the legal review ability is not matched.Research suggests that optimization should focus on five aspects:clarifying provincial governments as the decision-making body for delegation,refining the conditions for township People's(Sub-district oflice)Government acceptance,clarifying the standards for delegation of power,improving the procedures for delegation of power,and strengthening the construction of legal review capabilities,in order to achieve maximum institutional efficiency.
关 键 词:乡镇人民政府/街道办事处 社会治理 行政处罚权
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7