“二创短视频”的著作权性质认定及平台注意义务探究  

Exploring the Determination of Copyright Nature for Mash-up Videos and Platform Duty of Care

作　　者：路鹃 王子涵 张君昌 Lu Juan;Wang Zihan;Zhang Junchang

机构地区：[1]北京体育大学新闻与传播学院,北京100084

出　　处：《传媒观察》2024年第4期100-109,共10页Media Observer

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“5G时代短视频生产与传播的网络安全引导体系研究”(20BXW108)的阶段性成果;中广联合会社科研究重大项目“多元协同管理视角下网络短视频的法律规制研究”(2020ZGLH006)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：随着互联网技术的不断发展与商业模式的日渐完善,二次创作短视频(下称“二创短视频”)的作者逐渐从OGC/PGC(职业生产内容)向UGC(用户生产内容)转变,作品权利人、二创短视频创作者与信息存储空间服务公司之间的冲突不断凸显。由于作品合理使用界定的主观性、“通知-删除”规则适用关系的复杂性,致使创作者与信息储存空间服务公司的侵权判定在司法实践中依然困难。本文通过对2020年以来二创短视频侵权典型案例进行解读,结合短视频平台推荐场景下的技术运行机制与法律适用困境,探究在著作权人/版权所有者、上传者和信息存储空间服务者之间建立利益平衡的可行性。With the continuous advancement of Internet technology and the gradual evolution of business models,creators of mash-up videos are shifting from OGC/PGC(Occupationally-generated Content/Professionally-generated Content)to UGC(User-generated Content).Consequently,conflicts between the original rights holders,mash-up video creators,and information storage space service providers are becoming increasingly pronounced.The subjectivity in defining fair use of works and the complexity surrounding the application of the"notice and takedown"rule make it challenging to determine infringement in judicial practice between creators and information storage space service providers.This article examines typical cases of mash-up video infringement since 2020,delves into the technical and legal complexities inherent in recommended scenarios on short video platforms,and explores the feasibility of establishing a balanced framework of interests among copyright owners,uploaders,and information storage space service providers.

关 键 词：二创短视频 著作权 通知-删除 注意义务 红旗标准 

分 类 号：G206[文化科学—传播学]