检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:於冉 魏靖阳[1,2] 储昭君 YU Ran;WEI Jingyang;CHU Zhaojun(Research Institute of Land and Resources,Anhui Agricultural University,Hefei 230036,China;School of Economics and Management,Anhui Agricultural University,Hefei 230036,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽农业大学国土资源研究所,安徽合肥230036 [2]安徽农业大学经济管理学院,安徽合肥230036
出 处:《安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第2期112-123,共12页Journal of Anhui Agricultural University:SOC.SCI.
基 金:安徽省教育厅人文社会科学重点项目“乡村振兴背景下产城融合评价及区域差异研究——以安徽省16个地级市为例”(SK2019A0130);安徽省教育厅科学研究项目“基于‘城镇—农业—生态’协调的皖江流域国土空间开发生态风险识别及管控路径研究”(2023AH050969)。
摘 要:新安江流域作为首个跨省生态补偿政策试点,其政策实施对于地区城市整体生态治理具有正向促进作用,分析新安江流域城市政策实施前、中、后期的景观生态风险时空演变趋势及驱动因素,可为该地区及同类区域生态治理及风险防范提供科学支撑。基于2000、2010、2020年三期土地利用遥感数据,寻求评价景观生态风险的最优尺度,分析其时空演变趋势,并借助地理探测器计算空间因子的影响程度。研究表明:研究区最优研究尺度为粒度70 m、幅度11 km;2000—2020年,研究区景观生态风险显著降低,较高以上风险区面积大幅缩减,生态风险呈显著的空间正相关性,且相关程度不断减弱,高值聚集区逐渐减少;研究区内土地利用强度与坡度对景观生态风险驱动效应最强,各因子交互探测时可显著提高解释能力。研究区各市景观生态风险空间差异显著,需加强对草地、水域景观整体性的维护,进一步加强新安江流域城市生态稳定性,同时应考虑地区用地结构及风险状况,针对性采取风险治理措施。Xin’an River Basin is the first pilot area where cross-provincial ecological compensation policy is adopted,and the implementation of the policy has positively promoted the overall urban ecological governance in this region.By analyzing the spatio-temporal evolution of landscape ecological risks and its driving factors in the early,middle,and later periods of the policy implementation,we can provide scientific support for ecological governance and risk prevention in the region and similar regions.This paper seeks the optimal scale for evaluating the ecological risk of landscapes,analyzes its spatial and temporal evolution trends,and calculates the influence degree of spatial factors with the help of geoprobes based on the three-period remote sensing data of land use in the years 2000,2010,and 2020.The optimal study scale in the study area is 70 m in granularity and 11 km in amplitude;From 2000 to 2020,the ecological risk of the landscape in the study area has been significantly decreased,with higher risk areas greatly reduced.The ecological risk shows a significant positive spatial correlation,with the degree of correlation diminishing,and the area of high aggregation is gradually shrinking.Land use intensity and slope have the strongest driving effect on landscape ecological risk in the study area,and the validity is significantly improved when the factors are detected interactively.There are significant spatial differences in landscape ecological risks among the cities in the study area,and it is necessary to strengthen the integrated maintenance of grassland and water landscape to further enhance the urban ecological stability of Xin’an River Basin,and at the same time,the risk management measures should be taken in a targeted manner in view of the regional land use structure and the risk situation.
关 键 词:尺度效应 景观生态风险 时空演变 地理探测器 新安江流域城市
分 类 号:X321[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30