从“增长政治”到“秩序政治”——欧美城市政治学的范式转移与未来展望  

From"Politics of Growth"to"Politics of Order":Paradigm Shift and Future Prospects of Urban Politics in the United States and Europe

作　　者：葛天任[1] Ge Tianren

机构地区：[1]同济大学政治与国际关系学院,200092

出　　处：《世界社会科学》2024年第1期211-226,247,248,共18页SOCIAL SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助;国家社会科学基金一般项目“基于场景应用的社区治理智能化可行路径与风险防控研究”(22BSH022)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：随着全球不平等与城市危机深化,欧美城市政治学再度兴起。在西方民主制度下,自由市场经济缺乏系统性有效规制所带来的社会与政治深度碎片化,推动欧美城市政治学理论范式从“增长政治”转向“秩序政治”。欧美城市政治学需要进一步纳入全球、国家与技术维度的多层次分析,以增强自身的理论解释力,运用更加综合的混合方法以突破方法论局限,加强对发展中国家城市问题的比较研究以提高理论的跨国适用性。中国应建立具有共识的统一的理论范式并开展与新学科和新方法的交又交融,持续推动构建具有世界眼光和中国特色的城市政治学理论体系,为世界城市政治学发展提供中国贡献。With the deepening global inequality and urban crises,Western urban politics has once again emerged.Under Western democratic systems,the social and political fragmentation caused by the lack of systematic and effective regulation in the free-market economy has driven the paradigm shift in Western urban politics from"politics of growth"to"politics of order".Western urban politics needs to further incorporate multi-level analyses of global,national,and technological dimensions to enhance its theoretical explanatory capacity,utilize mixed methods to overcome methodological limitations,strengthen comparative studies on urban issues in developing countries to broaden the transnational applicability of theories.The implication for China is to establish a unified theoretical paradigm with consensus,to promote cross-disciplinary and methodological integration of new disciplines and methods,and to continuously advance a theory of urban politics with a global vision and Chinese characteristics,providing China's contribution to the development of global urban politics.

关 键 词：城市政治学 城市政体 政治秩序 范式转移 

分 类 号：D09[政治法律—政治学]