数据与信息的刑法区分性保护  

Criminal Law's Differentiated Protection of Data and Information in China

作　　者：熊波[1] Xiong Bo

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院

出　　处：《新闻与传播研究》2024年第3期90-101,128,共13页Journalism & Communication

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“数据安全的刑法区分性保护研究”(项目编号:22CFX015)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：数据和信息的混同性保护是我国数据犯罪治理现状的主要特点。混同性保护主要呈现“等同说、包容说、交叉说”三种具体现状,其导致数据法益体系的概括性,数据犯罪和信息犯罪之间、数据犯罪罪名之间的界限模糊,部分数据犯罪的相关罪名沦为兜底性罪名,一般数据保护的扩张化等现实危害。倡导数据和信息的区分性保护理念是应有之义,其主要依据在于,刑法保护的数据价值是工具性和载体性价值,刑法保护的信息价值是个人信息、财产信息、知识产权等信息本体内容价值。区分性保护规则可以围绕塑造数据状态安全和信息内容安全的法益类型、消除系统侵入行为入罪评价的信息依附性、区分认定破坏系统数据运行行为和信息内容处理行为、构建数据保护和信息保护的区分性入罪量化标准等内容予以展开。The undifferentiated protection between data and information is the main characteristic of China's current data crime governance.It mainly presents three specific situations:equivalence theory,inclusivity theory,and intersection theory.It has several drawbacks:the generalization of the data legal interest system,blurred boundaries between data crimes and information crimes,and blurred boundaries among charges.Some related charges of data crimes have become basic charges,and the expansion of general data protection poses practical risks.A concept of differentiated protection between data and information thus becomes necessary.This paper highlights several areas where a differentiated protection approach can be expanded.

关 键 词：数据 信息 数据状态安全 信息内容安全 区分性保护 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]