能否离开语言理解社会制度?-——论塞尔与图梅勒的集体接受理论之争  

Understanding Social Institutions without Language?:On the Debate between Searle and Tuomela's Collective Acceptance Theory

作　　者：李健民 LI Jian-min(School of Marxism,Shandong University of Technology,Zibo 255000,China)

机构地区：[1]山东理工大学马克思主义学院,淄博255000

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2024年第2期58-64,共7页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：山东省社科规划项目(23DZXJ02)。

摘　　要：分析哲学传统下,有关社会制度的集体意向性讨论是社会本体论这一形而上学分支的重要主题之一,在当代社会科学哲学领域方兴未艾。塞尔和图梅勒的集体接受理论都以作为集体意向性模式之一的集体接受为基础解释社会制度的创立与维持。图梅勒批判塞尔的集体接受理论缺乏对非语言行动的解释并尝试取消语言在解释社会制度上的本体论地位。事实上,语言是理解社会制度的根本,同时语言和行动不可分离,塞尔和图梅勒的集体接受理论在一定意义上互不矛盾、相互补充。Under the tradition of analytic philosophy,the discussion of collective intentionality about social institutions is one of the important topics of social ontology which as the branch of metaphysics,which is in the ascendant in the field of contemporary philosophy of social science.Searle and Tuomela's Collective Acceptance Theory both explain the creation and maintenance of social institutions basing on collective acceptance which is one of the modes of collective intentionality.Tuomela criticizes Searle's Collective Acceptance Theory for its lack of explanation of nonlinguistic action and he attempts to eliminate the ontological status of language in explaining social institutions.In fact,language is the foundation for understanding social institutions,language and action are inseparable.The Collective Acceptance Theory of Searle and Tuomela are not contradictory and complementary to each other in a certain sense.

关 键 词：社会本体论 集体接受 社会制度 语言 非语言行动 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]