检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何润 陈雨琪 He Run;Chen Yuqi(School of Social Sciences,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China;Department of Sociology,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
机构地区:[1]清华大学社会科学学院,北京100084 [2]北京大学社会学系,北京100871
出 处:《台州学院学报》2024年第2期31-39,49,共10页Journal of Taizhou University
摘 要:在互联网时代,公共话语资源的垄断性减弱,媒体越来越以第三方角色介入中国“国家与社会”关系,并在一定条件下影响两者间的权力格局。中国社会维权行动中权力关系的动态变迁和第三方赋权机制,超出了传统静态的权力关系框架和交往权力理论解释范畴。在具体的社会行动情境中,各个行动主体的权力并非恒定不变,国家与社会的关系在媒体的介入之下有改变的可能;同时,媒体赋权有其条件和边界,舆论退场后,也存在作为“影子”对弱势者进行隐形赋权的可能性。In the digital era,the monopolization of public discourse has diminished,leading to an increased intervention by media as a tertiary agent within the state-society nexus,potentially altering the extant power structure under certain conditions.The dynamics of power relations in Chinese social rights protection movements,along with the mechanisms of third-party empowerment,extend beyond the explanatory scope of traditional static frameworks of power relations and theories of communicative power.Within specific social action contexts,the power vested in various societal actors is not immutable;the state-society relations may shift in response to media intervention.Furthermore,media empowerment is conditional and circumscribed.Post-public discourse,there remains a likelihood of the media acting as an"invisible"empowering force for the disadvantaged,akin to a"shadow".
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49