一种构成性罗素式泛心论的小调色板模型  

A Small-palette Model of Constitutive Russellian Panpsychism

作　　者：刘凯 韩东晖[1] LIU Kai;HAN Dong-hui(College of Philosophy,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院,北京100872

出　　处：《科学技术哲学研究》2024年第2期33-40,共8页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“规范性哲学研究”(21&ZD049)。

摘　　要：构成性罗素式泛心论(CRP)是目前替代标准物理主义和二元论的最为重要的心身理论范式,但它面临着组合问题带来的巨大威胁。其中,调色板问题指的是,如果CRP为真,我们只能期许少许类型的微观性质,那么,有限类型的微观性质如何能够组合而产生大量的宏观性质?事实上,关于调色板问题的论证是可疑的,它并不能先验地证伪CRP。有多种回应思路,但只有组合论的小调色板策略与CRP兼容,L.勒洛夫斯提出的现象混合策略为我们解决调色板问题指明了方向,但她构造的小调色板方案却并不理想。可以在现象混合策略上增设一些关于经验的递嬗和共享法则,为CRP构造一种规避调色板问题的小调色板模型。Constitutive Russellian panpsychism(CRP)is currently the most important mind-body theory paradigm to replace standard physicalism and dualism,but it is facing a great threat from the combination problem.Among them,the palette problem refers to the fact that if CRP is true,we can only expect a few types of microqualities,so how can this limited palette of microqualities combine to yield the vast array of macroqualities?In fact,the argument for the palette problem is dubious,and it does not disprove CRP a priori.There are multiple lines of response,but only the small-palette solutions of combinatorial theory are compatible with CRP.The phenomenal blending solution proposed by L.Roelofs points out the direction for us to solve the palette problem,but the small-palette scheme she constructed is not ideal.We can add some rules about the transformation and sharing of experience to the phenomenon blending strategy to construct a small palette model for CRP to avoid the palette problem.

关 键 词：构成性罗素式泛心论 组合问题 调色板问题 小调色板策略 

分 类 号：N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]