明初边疆治理的权威政治:“以茶羁縻”与“茶叶反腐”——以欧阳伦贩私茶事件为讨论中心  

The Authoritative Politics of Frontier Governance in Early Ming Dynasty:“Tea as Means of Pacification”and“Tea Anti-Corruption”with Focus on Ouyang Lun's Private Tea Smuggling Incident

作　　者：赵国栋[1] 陆相瑾 Zhao Guodong;Lu Xiangjin

机构地区：[1]西藏民族大学法学院 [2]首都经济贸易大学

出　　处：《农业考古》2024年第2期81-90,共10页Agricultural Archaeology

基　　金：国家社科基金“西藏藏茶文化史料搜集、整理研究”(项目编号:21XTQ007)。

摘　　要：以茶羁縻和茶叶反腐在明洪武年间都受到高度重视,明廷也采取了多维度措施以保证二者的有效实施,对明代中后期的发展产生了重要影响。“欧阳伦贩私茶事件”进一步揭示出洪武年间以茶羁縻与茶叶反腐关系中的一种吊诡现象,促使这一现象出现的原因在于权威统治的深层问题。在中国传统社会历史的边疆治理中,如果缺乏系统的、法制化的有效运行机制,皇帝的个人魅力与忧患意识并无法真正有效解决腐败和治理的风险性问题。The practice of tea as pacification means and tea anti-corruption policies in the Hongwu Period of the Ming Dynasty were highly valued,and multi-dimensional measures were taken by the Ming government to ensure the effective implementation of both,which had an important impact on the middle and late Ming Dynasty.The“Ouyang Lun's private tea smuggling incident”further revealed a strange phenomenon in the relationship between tea as a means of pacification and tea anti-corruption policies during the Hongwu Period.The reason lay in the deep-seated problem of authority rule.In the frontier governance of Chinese traditional social history,if there were no systematic and legalized effective operation mechanism,the emperor's personal charm and sense of crisis could not have really effectively solve the problem of corruption and the risk of governance.

关 键 词：以茶羁縻 朱元璋 权威类型 边疆治理 

分 类 号：K248[历史地理—历史学]