检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苦打哈 孙华鑫 KU Da-ha;SUN Hua-xin(School of Law and Politics,Yunnan University of Finance and Economics,Yunnan,Kunming 650000)
出 处:《泰山学院学报》2024年第1期54-62,共9页Journal of Taishan University
基 金:湖南省未成年人检察理论研究基地研究项目“青少年网络毒品犯罪的应对机制研究”(22WJJDZC02);四川省高校人文社会科学重点研究基地基层司法能力研究中心项目“过失不作为犯的归责原理和司法适用”阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:近年来,由于逮捕要件缺乏客观准确的证明标准、逮捕实践理念有失偏颇、非羁押强制措施运行状况不佳等原因,导致司法实践中逮捕数量较多、逮捕率较高。较高逮捕率不但违背了逮捕作为预防性措施的本质功能,也违背了少捕慎诉慎押政策初衷,未能实现打击犯罪与保障人权的有机统一。因此,在少捕慎诉慎押政策下优化逮捕制度,分别从逮捕制度的观念层面、逮捕制度的实质要件层面和逮捕制度配套要件层面提出优化路径。In recent years,due to the lack of objective and accurate proof standards for arrest requirements,the biased concept of arrest practice,and the poor operation of non-custodial compulsory measures,the num-ber of arrests in judicial practice is large and the arrest rate is high.The high arrest rate not only violates the essential function of arrest as a preventive measure,but also goes against the original intention of the policy of careful prosecution and careful detention,and fails to realize the organic unity of combating crime and protecting human rights.Therefore,in order to optimize the arrest system under the policy of fewer arrests,more prudent prosecution and more prudent detention,the optimization paths are proposed from the conceptual level of the arrest system,the level of the substantive elements of the arrest system,and the level of the supporting elements of the arrest system,respectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7