语义悖论和溯因方法论  

Semantic Paradoxes and Abductive Methodology

作　　者：蒂莫西·威廉姆森 鲁彦君(译) Timothy Williamson;Lu Yanjun

机构地区：[1]牛津大学哲学系,牛津0X14BH [2]武汉大学哲学学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《河南社会科学》2024年第5期107-118,共12页Henan Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“当代逻辑哲学重大前沿问题研究”(17ZDA024)。

摘　　要：从基于不同后承关系的逻辑理论的比较入手,借鉴科学理论的选择标准,提出了一种对相互竞争的逻辑进行比较的一般方法论——溯因方法论。作者以溯因方法论为依托,论证了在解决语义悖论的方案中,修正经典逻辑而保留真的去引号原则所需要付出的代价远比通常认为的更高,由此为保留经典逻辑而限制或修改真的去引号原则提供辩护。This paper begins with a comparison of logical theories based on different consequence relations,and by drawing on the criteria for the selection of scientific theories,it proposes a general methodology for comparing competing logics—the abductive methodology.Relying on the abductive methodology,the author argues that in solutions to semantic paradoxes,the cost of revising classical logic while preserving the disquotational principle for truth is much higher than commonly thought.This provides a defense for retaining classical logic by restricting or modifying the disquotational principle for truth.

关 键 词：逻辑后承 溯因方法论 语义悖论 逻辑比较 经典逻辑 真的去引号原则 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]