案卷笔录中心主义影响下控辩平等路径研究  

Research on the Path of Prosecution and Defense Equality under the Influence of Case Record Centrism

作　　者：李岳 孙庚 LI Yue;SUN Geng(Department of Command and Tactics,Liaoning Police College,Dalian Liaoning 116036,China;Command Center,Tieling Public Security Bureau,Tieling Liaoning 112000,China)

机构地区：[1]辽宁警察学院指挥战术系,辽宁大连116036 [2]铁岭市公安局指挥中心,辽宁铁岭112000

出　　处：《辽宁警察学院学报》2024年第3期57-62,共6页Journal of Liaoning Police College

摘　　要：在目前以案卷笔录为裁判依据的庭审实质下,受职权主义模式、案件办理流程和抗辩手段缺失等因素影响,法庭在对关键证据的认定上容易产生误解,致使量刑上出现偏差,控辩双方力量明显失衡。为弱化案卷笔录中心主义影响,尝试探索丰富控辩平等的路径,不仅能够避免庭审流于形式、促进法官形成合理自由心证,还能够减少冤错案件产生。通过实施控方证据开示制度、赋予被追诉方参与调查权利、强化专家辅助人作用和确定被追诉人沉默权等方式,拓宽控辩平等路径,保证被追诉人权利,实现司法公正。Due to the authoritarian mode,case handling process and the absence of defense means under the current trial essence based on the case records,the court is prone to misunderstanding the identification of key evidence,which lead to the deviation of sentencing,and the obvious imbalance of power between the prosecution and the defense.In order to weaken the influence of case record centralism,we try to explore a rich path of equal prosecution and defense,it can not only avoid the trial formalities and promote the judges to form reasonable and free evidence,but also reduce the occurrence of wrongful cases.By implementing the prosecution evidence disclosure system,endowing the prosecuted party with the right to participate in the investigation,strengthening the role of expert assistants and determining the right to silence of the prosecuted party,the equal path of prosecution and defense is further widened,the rights of the accused are guaranteed,and judicial justice is realized.

关 键 词：控辩平等 刑事诉讼 对抗式庭审 案卷笔录中心主义 

分 类 号：D912.14[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]