检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐慧 朱健刚 XU Hui;ZHU Jiangang
机构地区:[1]深圳技师学院,深圳518116 [2]南开大学社会学院,天津300350
出 处:《残疾人研究》2024年第2期85-95,共11页Disability Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“残疾人社会组织活力的社会机制研究”(21&ZD182);中国残疾人联合会2022年课题“助残社会组织发展研究”(22&ZC046)。
摘 要:精神卫生服务已呈现出社区化发展趋势。但如何在社区构建高效而专业的精神卫生服务体系,仍然是摆在中国精神残障人事业发展面前的重要课题。本文以精神病学理论和技术发展为轴线,通过回溯法、美、英、意大利四国自二战后参照不同精神病学理论构建社区精神卫生服务体系的历程,分析总结了欧美四国在“去机构化”运动中所取得的经验与教训,并对各国社区精神卫生服务模式及其成效做了综合比较,发现良好的精神卫生服务体系得益于各要素之间的最优组合,包括适合本国社区环境的精神病学理论与技术、对包含医疗和社会支持的服务内容做科学有效的管理与规划、充足的财政支持、积极的福利政策、质量和数量兼具的专业人才。The delivery of mental health services has shown a development trend of community engagement.However,how to construct an efficient and professional community mental health service system is still an essential issue for the development of China's cause of persons with mental disabilities.While reviewing the development of psychiatric theories and therapeutic techniques,we reviewed the community mental health service systems in France,the United States,Britain and Italy established by referring to different contemporary psychiatric theories since World War II,then analyzed and summarized the successful experiences and failures that the four countries gained from the“deinstitutionalization”movement,and comprehensively compared community mental health models and their effectiveness in the countries.We found that a good mental health service system depends on the optimal combination of the factors as follows:psychiatric theories and techniques applicable to the community environment of a country;scientific and effective organization and management of services including psychiatric treatment and social support;adequate financial support;proactive welfare policies;enough qualified mental health workers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43